Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are You Satisfied with the WR Position?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scotscheese" data-source="post: 886449" data-attributes="member: 9400"><p>did we really need another thread about WR's, even taking into account the poll?</p><p></p><p>the question is very biased imo, as at the start of the season(pre-covid) we had DA, had signed funchess(as probably a no2), then had Lazard/MVS/ESB fighting it out for spots 3/4(Laz had probably edged it tail end of last season). the fact that to use your "as is" as a former for our opinion when 2 of our top 3 are out for various reasons, means are we happy using our backups as starters when they were never planned as starters in the first place. I'm struggling to find your point in this thread and poll because of this? leaving funchess and Laz out is an unfair assesment on the WR corp imo.</p><p></p><p>Also, please name one team, that in our position of having 2 starters out would be happy playing their backups in place</p><p></p><p>Run D needs more attention in my eyes</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scotscheese, post: 886449, member: 9400"] did we really need another thread about WR's, even taking into account the poll? the question is very biased imo, as at the start of the season(pre-covid) we had DA, had signed funchess(as probably a no2), then had Lazard/MVS/ESB fighting it out for spots 3/4(Laz had probably edged it tail end of last season). the fact that to use your "as is" as a former for our opinion when 2 of our top 3 are out for various reasons, means are we happy using our backups as starters when they were never planned as starters in the first place. I'm struggling to find your point in this thread and poll because of this? leaving funchess and Laz out is an unfair assesment on the WR corp imo. Also, please name one team, that in our position of having 2 starters out would be happy playing their backups in place Run D needs more attention in my eyes [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Guacamole
gopkrs
tynimiller
Emur
PackerDNA
DoURant
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are You Satisfied with the WR Position?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top