Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="scotscheese" data-source="post: 886449" data-attributes="member: 9400">did we really need another thread about WR's, even taking into account the poll?the question is very biased imo, as at the start of the season(pre-covid) we had DA, had signed funchess(as probably a no2), then had Lazard/MVS/ESB fighting it out for spots 3/4(Laz had probably edged it tail end of last season). the fact that to use your "as is" as a former for our opinion when 2 of our top 3 are out for various reasons, means are we happy using our backups as starters when they were never planned as starters in the first place. I'm struggling to find your point in this thread and poll because of this? leaving funchess and Laz out is an unfair assesment on the WR corp imo.Also, please name one team, that in our position of having 2 starters out would be happy playing their backups in placeRun D needs more attention in my eyes</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 611 (members: 0, guests: 611)