Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are you going to keep watching football?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 949437" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>Not only review it but they may even move the ball 6 inches after a 5 minute review. I remember McCarthy challenging the spot one time. They ruled the runner was short of the first down and he threw the flag. They looked at it and moved the ball 6 inches closer but it was still short so they charged a timeout. I wondered what exactly was challenged. Did he challenge that it was a first down because if he did then yes he was wrong and should have been charged the TO. If he simply challenged the spot of the ball then he was obviously right because they moved it and thus he shouldn't have been charged the TO.</p><p></p><p>Maybe they should make it so that a team has 3 challenges but if they want they can use 2 challenges on any one play to challenge any call they want. That way an egregious missed call like the illegal procedure could still be challenged. Call it a super challenge but the the team has to have at least 2 challenges to call it. Or make it optional to give up a TO even if they get it right to be able to challenge such plays. You still need to have a challenge to throw the flag but if its a "non reviewable" call they can say Ok we will give up a TO even if we get the challenge. </p><p></p><p>For the most part I like replay but I don't think it is as good as it could be. A lot of so called judgement calls that are not reviewable are not really judgments as they are simply missed. That illegal procedure non call was not a judgement call it was a missed call and as such should be reviewable. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Dollars, many many dollars.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 949437, member: 10247"] Not only review it but they may even move the ball 6 inches after a 5 minute review. I remember McCarthy challenging the spot one time. They ruled the runner was short of the first down and he threw the flag. They looked at it and moved the ball 6 inches closer but it was still short so they charged a timeout. I wondered what exactly was challenged. Did he challenge that it was a first down because if he did then yes he was wrong and should have been charged the TO. If he simply challenged the spot of the ball then he was obviously right because they moved it and thus he shouldn't have been charged the TO. Maybe they should make it so that a team has 3 challenges but if they want they can use 2 challenges on any one play to challenge any call they want. That way an egregious missed call like the illegal procedure could still be challenged. Call it a super challenge but the the team has to have at least 2 challenges to call it. Or make it optional to give up a TO even if they get it right to be able to challenge such plays. You still need to have a challenge to throw the flag but if its a "non reviewable" call they can say Ok we will give up a TO even if we get the challenge. For the most part I like replay but I don't think it is as good as it could be. A lot of so called judgement calls that are not reviewable are not really judgments as they are simply missed. That illegal procedure non call was not a judgement call it was a missed call and as such should be reviewable. Dollars, many many dollars. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
shockerx
mradtke66
Latest posts
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:36 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:20 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Are you going to keep watching football?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
