Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 246920" data-attributes="member: 1429">I don't see anyone better than the pats and steelers. The pats just got Burgess, so, yeah, they're good. And the steelers already have an amazing D, and their running game will be good with the Rbs healthy. And San Diego. San Diego is a great team, with Merriman back, they'll be contenders.NFC I don't know. I would say the eagles, but they don't have weapons on their passing game (Maclin is a rookie, and Jackson is a midget), and their front 7 on D aren't really that good. They played so well because Jim Johnson was an absolut genius. The Giants have the great D and amazing running game, but without a standout Wr I don't know if they can be that great. But if I had to choose one team from the NFC, I would choose the Giants. Everyone's putting the Saints, but that's just a joke. No running game, no D. They will reach the playoffs, but not the SB. Atlanta is another joke, IMO. About the Redskins, every year they go and grab the best FA out there, and every year they fail. They're the contrary of us. Their have 0 chemistry. Arizona can surprise. They have the best passing game, a great OL, and a very solid D. But they lost all their coordinators... -All in all, outside us, I think Pats, Steelers, Chargers, Giants, Eagles. AFC is definitely better than NFC. But when everything's at stake, anything can happen.</blockquote>

Total: 716 (members: 3, guests: 713)