Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HyponGrey" data-source="post: 510188" data-attributes="member: 6441"><p>McMillian is going nowhere. If he's not starting, he'll be the only experienced backup at S besides Bush. House is the only backup CB with the skill set to play on the outside. Not even a remote chance he gets cut. He also made a big comeback, he didn't get thrown at much later on. Bush may be gone in the near future though, Hyde is a great gunner. Hyde also hasn't been tried at S yet, not a single rep. He's the dime CB.</p><p></p><p>Crosby's restructure makes him cuttable. ST blockers should be ashamed, and the Tacklers were even worse. Did we really have a return man battle? Because it certainly doesn't look like we've been practicing.</p><p></p><p>Neal looked better at OLB. It was a pleasant surprise, even if it WAS against scrubs. Good chance we go light here.</p><p></p><p>ILB is more about coverage, where Manning has a clear lean on Barrington, even if Barrington has a slight physicality lean. Barrington did however outplay Manning, so he would be my choice between the two.</p><p></p><p>We don't need 2 FB, as all of our TE besides Bostick have experience as lead blockers. I hope we can trade Williams. He doesn't fit our system, and I really like Bostick.</p><p></p><p>BTW WTH, that was before Tretter got hurt. You may not remember, but he was supposed to be the back up C. I was excited to see what he could do. I thought Pat Lewis was a very high upside prospect who played on one of the best OL in college football. EDS is a quality backup, who held his own last year at the end of the year as a starter. I admitted there were things he needed to get better at to be a starter, most notably I criticized his line calls, but the brass was going to give him his shot as a starter, like it or not. GVR looked like a good developmental guy. Currently seems EDS looked good against gassed starters as a fresh man, and GVR didn't develop much at all. I didn't "berate" you then, but I will now. You're an idiot with absurd opinions who needs to stop overreacting. I don't enjoy being called out, especially on false charges. Congrats on the ignore dip<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/poop.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":poop:" title="Poop :poop:" data-shortname=":poop:" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HyponGrey, post: 510188, member: 6441"] McMillian is going nowhere. If he's not starting, he'll be the only experienced backup at S besides Bush. House is the only backup CB with the skill set to play on the outside. Not even a remote chance he gets cut. He also made a big comeback, he didn't get thrown at much later on. Bush may be gone in the near future though, Hyde is a great gunner. Hyde also hasn't been tried at S yet, not a single rep. He's the dime CB. Crosby's restructure makes him cuttable. ST blockers should be ashamed, and the Tacklers were even worse. Did we really have a return man battle? Because it certainly doesn't look like we've been practicing. Neal looked better at OLB. It was a pleasant surprise, even if it WAS against scrubs. Good chance we go light here. ILB is more about coverage, where Manning has a clear lean on Barrington, even if Barrington has a slight physicality lean. Barrington did however outplay Manning, so he would be my choice between the two. We don't need 2 FB, as all of our TE besides Bostick have experience as lead blockers. I hope we can trade Williams. He doesn't fit our system, and I really like Bostick. BTW WTH, that was before Tretter got hurt. You may not remember, but he was supposed to be the back up C. I was excited to see what he could do. I thought Pat Lewis was a very high upside prospect who played on one of the best OL in college football. EDS is a quality backup, who held his own last year at the end of the year as a starter. I admitted there were things he needed to get better at to be a starter, most notably I criticized his line calls, but the brass was going to give him his shot as a starter, like it or not. GVR looked like a good developmental guy. Currently seems EDS looked good against gassed starters as a fresh man, and GVR didn't develop much at all. I didn't "berate" you then, but I will now. You're an idiot with absurd opinions who needs to stop overreacting. I don't enjoy being called out, especially on false charges. Congrats on the ignore dip:poop:. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
SudsMcBucky
CarryTheG14
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 9:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
