Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 509958" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>After tonight’s "display" I’m beginning to like the depth at QB. Don’t get me wrong, not the "depth" you're probably thinking of: Young was bad and the best thing you can say about Coleman’s preseason performances is they’ve been inconsistent. So here’s my half-serious suggestion for QB depth after Rodgers: Randal Cobb and then Micah Hyde. The broadcasters tonight were saying how Thompson and McCarthy have a different approach to their final roster – they keep the best 53 regardless of position. Of course that’s nonsense – perhaps they pay less attention to numbers at positions than other teams but of course they can’t purely keep the best 53. But here’s hoping they stick to that "pure" idea at QB. Jettison Young and Coleman and keep two better players at other positions. After all if Rodgers misses significant time we are sunk anyway. May as well keep better 52nd and 53rd players.</p><p></p><p>Seriously, the Packers are deep at a couple of positions - CBs and perhaps DL - but thin at others like OL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 509958, member: 4300"] After tonight’s "display" I’m beginning to like the depth at QB. Don’t get me wrong, not the "depth" you're probably thinking of: Young was bad and the best thing you can say about Coleman’s preseason performances is they’ve been inconsistent. So here’s my half-serious suggestion for QB depth after Rodgers: Randal Cobb and then Micah Hyde. The broadcasters tonight were saying how Thompson and McCarthy have a different approach to their final roster – they keep the best 53 regardless of position. Of course that’s nonsense – perhaps they pay less attention to numbers at positions than other teams but of course they can’t purely keep the best 53. But here’s hoping they stick to that "pure" idea at QB. Jettison Young and Coleman and keep two better players at other positions. After all if Rodgers misses significant time we are sunk anyway. May as well keep better 52nd and 53rd players. Seriously, the Packers are deep at a couple of positions - CBs and perhaps DL - but thin at others like OL. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GleefulGary
Today at 3:30 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 3:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Anyone else feeling queesy about our depth chart?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top