Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ExpatPacker" data-source="post: 637495" data-attributes="member: 5535">I do feel however that Rodgers bears partial responsibility for this year's debacle.  I'm not going to say that he has regressed, but he has certainly not played anywhere close to what an MVP QB should.  A lot of his throws are off, his pocket presence is poor, he has often not seen the open receiver when they are in fact open (which hasn't been often).  Those are 3 things.Watching the Denver - Pats game the other night, the vast difference between Brady and Rodgers this season was so apparent, it was shocking.  Brady had Gronk for most of the game it's true, but he didn't have Amendola nor did he have Edelman, and his throws were crisp, on-target, his reads were spot-on, and he handled a pretty stiff pass rush with poise.  Even when Gronk went down Brady still delivered.  Comparing him to Rodgers was night and day.  I will not fault Rodgers for all of it, because Brady's receivers were open far more than Rodgers', but the openness of receivers is part personnel, part scheme, part QB's reads.  And Brady had them in it even though the Pats were getting jobbed by the refs.I don't know what is wrong with Rodgers, but there is something.</blockquote>

Total: 779 (members: 1, guests: 778)