Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 1038054" data-attributes="member: 4199">I would presume it would.  Your 2023 numbers are higher, but iirc, only on the order of 2%.  That could be gradual improvement, that could be an abnormal year.  We'd have to look at multiple years and look for a trend.It seems unlikely, but also possible. Anders already breaks this pattern by making 100% of his field goals in the 30-39 range, but only making 87.2Slight tangent: The NFL obviously wanted more missed XPAs or rather, make them less automatic.  Approaching 100% is pretty boring.  They must have had a desired pass/fail rate when they moved it to where they did.  Were they hoping for 95%? 90%?  Were it me, I'd back it up until it's only slightly safer than the 2PT.  If 2PTs are 45% successful, I'd want XPAs to be 91% successful.  The 10 year dataset says 33-35 yards, with a range of 94 and 90 percent.  Seems they had roughly the same idea.In 2023, XPAs were almost 96% successful.  One line of questions, one thought:Q: what is different about XPAs and regular kicks?  Are they practiced differently?  Should something change with how Anders is practicing one vs. the other?Thought: We might want to back up the XPA line a couple yards to get that percentage down.</blockquote>

Total: 2,024 (members: 4, guests: 2,020)