Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Amish 57th Annual Draft Contest - by proxy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 957985" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Well it’s not always that simple.</p><p>Such as If we had an option to get Garrett Wilson with 22, 92.</p><p> I’d take that trade.</p><p></p><p>While I understand losing a Day 2 selection seems harsh (and on surface I’d agree).</p><p> Because it’s not a dead end. we can perfect other trades to recoup that 3rd if we wanted. Such as moving back from 28 into early round 2</p><p></p><p>Meaning It eventually comes down to is that player worth the value of those combined selections.</p><p>At 17-18 valued selection overall is Garrett worth it? Yes that’s a bargain imo. In reality, He’s probably gone by Washington’s pick but stranger things have happened. Aaron Rodgers should’ve never skipped past teens.</p><p></p><p>Like you though. I’d prefer we trade up only that far max (17-18) and really think we should just stay easy and steady.</p><p>No stupid reaches.</p><p>Id really like to trust the draft to come to us.. we’ve plenty firepower and shouldn’t flinch. Unless there’s a player we have Pegged in just stupid slippage. Karlaftis at a 26 trade up absolutely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 957985, member: 10086"] Well it’s not always that simple. Such as If we had an option to get Garrett Wilson with 22, 92. I’d take that trade. While I understand losing a Day 2 selection seems harsh (and on surface I’d agree). Because it’s not a dead end. we can perfect other trades to recoup that 3rd if we wanted. Such as moving back from 28 into early round 2 Meaning It eventually comes down to is that player worth the value of those combined selections. At 17-18 valued selection overall is Garrett worth it? Yes that’s a bargain imo. In reality, He’s probably gone by Washington’s pick but stranger things have happened. Aaron Rodgers should’ve never skipped past teens. Like you though. I’d prefer we trade up only that far max (17-18) and really think we should just stay easy and steady. No stupid reaches. Id really like to trust the draft to come to us.. we’ve plenty firepower and shouldn’t flinch. Unless there’s a player we have Pegged in just stupid slippage. Karlaftis at a 26 trade up absolutely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
mradtke66
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: milani
Today at 2:09 PM
Introduce Yourself
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: milani
Today at 2:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 1:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Amish 57th Annual Draft Contest - by proxy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top