Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 877260" data-attributes="member: 10329">And the Packers were one of the worst offenses in the league with Rodgers QBR being absolutely dreadful when Jones was replaced by Williams. (When Jones was in both Rodgers and the Packers offense as a whole could actually have been argued as elite when looking at those on/off numbers)<a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2020/01/02/this-stat-demonstrates-aaron-jones-incredible-value-to-packers-offense/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwj43pCmosHpAhVPZc0KHbOPCL8QFjADegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw00IvhsKV6_XA2q_gZXI7zI&cf=1" target="_blank">https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2020/01/02/this-stat-demonstrates-aaron-jones-incredible-value-to-packers-offense/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwj43pCmosHpAhVPZc0KHbOPCL8QFjADegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw00IvhsKV6_XA2q_gZXI7zI&cf=1</a>So I'm not not sure what you're arguing. It would seem lowering the drop-off from RB1 to RB2 would not only make sense but be labeled a priorityHell at the risk of blasphemy on this board, simply by going off those stats, you can argue RB2 was a bigger need then any other position on offense outside of replacing Bulaga (not saying I'm arguing that but you could)</blockquote>

Total: 230 (members: 2, guests: 228)