Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pack93z" data-source="post: 182528" data-attributes="member: 288">I could argue this point all day.. you still haven't explained the responsibilites of the Wil in the Tampa two..Your first read beyond run vs pass in both of the sets is inside outside... meaning is the playing going to the edges.. since I am the first line of defense that is my responsiblity.. are they comming outside either run or pass.. after that read it is the short zone in both unless you are playing man up.. which you pointed out correctly that he is staying in on alot of those 3 reciever sets.. meaning they trust him to drop into the short zone.. same as the Tampa Two except our drops seem to be narrower in design. On running plays, you don't think there is gap responsiblity with the Tampa two.. we aren't talking zone blitz schemes.. straight up tampa two coverage is almost exclusively an secondary scheme to protect the corners.. it weakness is up the center of the field if you can get the safeties moving.. On running plays.. depending on the d-line calls your gaps are fluid.. much like the front we play.. expect in most tampa two you have fast de that shoot up the field and the backers have to cover more interior as well.. those maybe your reasoning for more tackle opportunities.</blockquote>

Total: 681 (members: 1, guests: 680)