Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1058596" data-attributes="member: 10086">Hey what’s up Poker. It’s a good way to look at it. Contributions for the Team the GM drafts for.I can see a side argument looking at a players full picture when we are speaking to draft ability of a GM. I say that because in certain cases, our Coaches didn’t use said player to their ceiling (schematic misusage etc). So that argument of protection of our GM because said player might’ve slightly underperformed in GB because our DC didn’t understand how to utilize him. Burks was always a good example because he’s truly the tweener definition (Converted high performing Safety who had the frame of a LB and was a LB experiment later in college) Then goes onto normalize himself once out of GB to his draft stick (3rd Rd) More a poor reflection on the Coaching side is what I’m saying. Yes I agree though our team holds precedent though in the GM rating. However I’m not going to ding our GM as heavily if a particular draftee goes onto having a lucrative career, if that makes sense.I can see both sides, neither are really wrong in relation to draft ability of a GM. Brett Favre is another anomaly that both arguments could be correct due to the trading aspect you referenced.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 111 (members: 0, guests: 111)