Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shawnsta3" data-source="post: 471774" data-attributes="member: 5065">Good thing almost half of these guys you mentioned went undrafted right? After all, the best RB's always do. Pats 2003 Smith 23 overall/ Faulk 46 overallPats 2004 Dillon 43 overall/ Faulk 46 overallPitt 2005 Bettis 10 overall/ Parker undraftedColts 2006 (Addai?) 30 overall/ Rhodes undraftedGiants 2007 Jacobs 110 overall/ Ward undraftedPitt 2008 Parker undrafted/ Moore 119 overallSaints 2009 Thomas undrafted/ undraftedPackers 2010 Jackson 63 overall/ Kuhn undraftedGiants 2011 Jacobs 110 overall/ 250 overall According to the names you provided me of the last 9 Super Bowl winners with their top 2 rushers is 18 names, 7 were undrafted and 3 were taken in the first round. I know where I want Ted to target a running back next year. The fact is A running back is not a smart way to use a draft pick, especially early. Every fact points to it, the difference between running backs in the draft from top to bottom (or in this case not in the draft at all) are very slim. I see your post wasn't directly arguing running backs and the draft but I got the feeling you meant to get help in the running game through the draft, early. At the very least this was just a expansion on my last comment with your information and my take on it. Disregard if so.</blockquote>

Total: 317 (members: 3, guests: 314)