Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1096821" data-attributes="member: 10086">For me I’m in the middle of this immediate benefit over long term benefit debate. First of all I don’t think most teams expect a day 1 starter (much less a great one) just because he’s drafted Day 1. I think that goes for nearly every NFL team. That might be a Wish or desire but it’s just not reality.The area of RD1 does matter. I think you’d agree we draft later than the average team. That goes with the territory of contender. If we had recent draft picks at #3 overall #6 overall and drafted, Im grading those with higher expectations. Thats your best player at a position or Blue Chip athlete.  Thats why I could agree with an argument of a player like Van Ness being too raw. Yet many of our other players were picks 17-32 or back half of Day 1. Those Top 5 or maybe Top 10 types are pretty much picked over imo.</blockquote>

Total: 618 (members: 2, guests: 616)