Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 1095666" data-attributes="member: 9780"><p>I was thinking we might have a player trade that might net is a 1st.... Doubs, and wicks gone, it would be risky to trade a wr away..... The idea of watson, reed, Golden, Kraft, and jacobs backing them up? Sounds unstoppable if you ask me.... </p><p></p><p>Still have solid depth behind them.... Savion williams being the one who I honestly hate to see on the bench...</p><p></p><p>GB also developes WRs better than anyone in the league imo. Right in line with our QB program. They take time, but we are basically batting 1.000% on day one and 2 WRs the last 25 years..... </p><p></p><p>That said..... Watson and Reed are both going to be expensive. Trading one that we will lose in free agency the following year, for a 1st round pick. Would not be a horrible decision imo. When I look at it as a transfer of talent from one position of strength to another of weakness. It's not unthinkable.... </p><p></p><p>Now I agree that the goal is to field the best team we can. Love to Watson, reed, Golden, Kraft, is that best team..... </p><p></p><p>But we don't have any depth on the oline. Our CBs are one injury away from being in trouble already too. That 1st round pick could get is a true blue chip nose tackle, or another edge of we don't think LVN is going to take our offer. </p><p></p><p>Or we trade that 1st rounder down a couple times and add some depth at multiple positions? </p><p></p><p>Fact is. That 3rd #1 caliber wr isn't going to do anything, if the oline can't protect love. Or if we can't stop the run and get the good running teams off the field.... </p><p></p><p>Something to think about. </p><p></p><p>If I was a team looking at WR in the 1st round. And reed is available. That's a no brainer. I'd take the young proven turn key #1 wr.</p><p></p><p>Watson and Savion on the outside, with golden moving around slicing and dicing nickel backs.... That works too</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenBaySlacker, post: 1095666, member: 9780"] I was thinking we might have a player trade that might net is a 1st.... Doubs, and wicks gone, it would be risky to trade a wr away..... The idea of watson, reed, Golden, Kraft, and jacobs backing them up? Sounds unstoppable if you ask me.... Still have solid depth behind them.... Savion williams being the one who I honestly hate to see on the bench... GB also developes WRs better than anyone in the league imo. Right in line with our QB program. They take time, but we are basically batting 1.000% on day one and 2 WRs the last 25 years..... That said..... Watson and Reed are both going to be expensive. Trading one that we will lose in free agency the following year, for a 1st round pick. Would not be a horrible decision imo. When I look at it as a transfer of talent from one position of strength to another of weakness. It's not unthinkable.... Now I agree that the goal is to field the best team we can. Love to Watson, reed, Golden, Kraft, is that best team..... But we don't have any depth on the oline. Our CBs are one injury away from being in trouble already too. That 1st round pick could get is a true blue chip nose tackle, or another edge of we don't think LVN is going to take our offer. Or we trade that 1st rounder down a couple times and add some depth at multiple positions? Fact is. That 3rd #1 caliber wr isn't going to do anything, if the oline can't protect love. Or if we can't stop the run and get the good running teams off the field.... Something to think about. If I was a team looking at WR in the 1st round. And reed is available. That's a no brainer. I'd take the young proven turn key #1 wr. Watson and Savion on the outside, with golden moving around slicing and dicing nickel backs.... That works too [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top