Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1094045" data-attributes="member: 10086">Ok. See I see a big difference between  a player winning a starter role (Reed) as a Rookie. Versus a player getting playing time as a Rookie (I’ll use Tae Wicks because he played about as much as any example I can think of from Day3. Romeo is a good example of a guy you snag in RD4-7 that “plays” significant time but isn’t a FT starter for 15-17 games.  He might at best fill in as a starter for injury or develop into a starter as season progresses. He started I think 7 games so that’s pretty high level for a Rook.I think expecting a Rookie from Day 3 to be our starter is going to regularly  bring disappointment.  Specifically on this Roster though? A Rookie WR in 2026 would have to beat out Reed or Golden or Watson. I suppose it’s not impossible but highly unlikely or not expected for sure.  So we can all hope together but be realistic about those chances.</blockquote>

Total: 1,155 (members: 3, guests: 1,152)