Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1092677" data-attributes="member: 10086">It’s about cost to me. He’s not worth anything past $8-10Mil annual. He is an above average LB, I’m just still on the fence with him. IMO he’s replaceable at less $$ than the likely $10Mil annual he’ll sign for.  I’d almost prefer we part from his $10Mil and draft a LB by RD5 area. Similar to what we did there with McDuffie. I’d prefer we use $10Mil annual to get the best version of OC, DT or CB.I do think GB will appease him an overpay. Which I understand they don’t have time to wait a year he’s plug n play. Which is with something there.That said I do think GB will resign either Niemann or Welch, so they’ll have 4 LB’s on contract very soon. Just imo. So reestablishing Quay as a fixture would become 5 on contract.  That does help alleviate 1 position to not have to focus on this draft. LB.  We could wait until RD5-7 etc.I see both sides on this Quay argument. Now if we locked him on a 3yr/$25Mil type deal and could only apply $5mil without much cap push? I’d be all over that.  My fear is he gets a 3yr $35mil type contract and I just see better ways to apply that $$$</blockquote>

Total: 593 (members: 2, guests: 591)