Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095948" data-attributes="member: 10086">I see Watson ceiling in that 1,100-1200 area. Just imo. He paced just over 1,000 last year, but he can’t seem to get a streak of health. I think a more normal expectancy with #9 is around 750-900 yards regularly. So a good WR2 with some added value because of home run speed and blocking prowess. A high end WR2.No way do I want to pay Watson like a top end WR1. I just think that’s almost foolish. If either Lance or Hurst were added? I wouldn’t think twice about walking away from Watson. No thanks for $30mil I’d rather go grab a PAIR of good FA players before doing that. Such as Wyatt and Kraft. I’d rather use #84 and package a Day 3 pick from 2027 and get his replacement OR draft at WR higher next year with a Day 2 for $1.75Mil yearly for 4 years. Green Bay spreads the ball around too much to pay 1 guy elite $$ imo. I’d pay Kraft $20Mil before I paid #9 $30Mil yearly.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 867 (members: 0, guests: 867)