Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095378" data-attributes="member: 10086">Hey [USER=6578]@tynimiller[/USER] I agree with this in general. You must be itching in your shorts with the draft this close. lol.Kinda doing the Roster math at WR based on Visits mixed with a good, deep position. There have been some recent drafts with a High % of smaller speed WR (Slot types etc) that didn’t really fit what we needed. This draft is a better mix with bigger receivers or guys that can play multiple WR roles.Then seeing GB poking around for WR prospects that we both know are Day 2 worthy. highly likely GB takes 1 WR RD2-4 to fill some big shoes that left. I’m about 90% certain we learned our lesson at Returner last season so Skyy is a lock for me.WatsonReedGoldenSavionSkyyRD3 (estimate)Now this is if we only choose 1 WR in 8 selections. The wise thing to do is not overlap here.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 819 (members: 1, guests: 818)