Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1032501" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>As more n more information comes in from interest we have? I really LOVE that 120-175 for a second CB/Safety (possibly even a 2nd or 3rd OL) IF our ideal selection isn’t there at #41 or #58? I’m doing a mini-move back (similar to last draft) an acquiring 1-2 more selections in that Rd4-Rd6 area.</p><p> One advantage of not being forced to pick WR/TEis we can really focus on the future at iLB/Saf/CB. While it’s still likely we get 1 pick from the TE/WR group it’s not imperative either. Having an extra 4th or 5th is a contingency at OL/DL/RB we might have otherwise missed at in Day2. I often get either OT or OG locked in the top 100, but not always both.</p><p>I’ve seen a few scenarios where Buffalo, Raiders etc. want to move up for from 42/44 area. That’s absolutely a move I’d consider if it gets us into that later RD4 neighborhood. Even if it takes sending a late 7th back.</p><p></p><p>I Love the versatility of 5 Top 100’s that’s been fun to work with in various ways and should really infuse our young team with formidable options. We saw what Reed, Kraft and Musgrave did last year. We could get that at OL or LB or whatnot. However, I say this also because we’re a little thin early-mid Day3 (#126/169). It’s almost like the lack of Juniors and Covid and versatility effects of NIL has pushed some older/more experienced players from the College fray into the middle of this draft. Normally that might be deemed as a - not in a win now environment for the next 4 years imo. They’ve got that extra 1-2 years experience and look more pro ready for a 4th-5th rounder.</p><p></p><p>I’ll finish be saying I’d stress getting at minimum 1 more stab in that early-mid Day3 area. Again even if we sweeten it with a #245 etc. I’m amazed at some of the draft options especially either side of 150 overall. </p><p></p><p>McCormick, Limmer, Coleman, Jarrian Jones, Kalen King, Mustspha, Brade, Olodapo, Vaki the list goes on. Go ahead and pick an extra 1-2 on me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1032501, member: 10086"] As more n more information comes in from interest we have? I really LOVE that 120-175 for a second CB/Safety (possibly even a 2nd or 3rd OL) IF our ideal selection isn’t there at #41 or #58? I’m doing a mini-move back (similar to last draft) an acquiring 1-2 more selections in that Rd4-Rd6 area. One advantage of not being forced to pick WR/TEis we can really focus on the future at iLB/Saf/CB. While it’s still likely we get 1 pick from the TE/WR group it’s not imperative either. Having an extra 4th or 5th is a contingency at OL/DL/RB we might have otherwise missed at in Day2. I often get either OT or OG locked in the top 100, but not always both. I’ve seen a few scenarios where Buffalo, Raiders etc. want to move up for from 42/44 area. That’s absolutely a move I’d consider if it gets us into that later RD4 neighborhood. Even if it takes sending a late 7th back. I Love the versatility of 5 Top 100’s that’s been fun to work with in various ways and should really infuse our young team with formidable options. We saw what Reed, Kraft and Musgrave did last year. We could get that at OL or LB or whatnot. However, I say this also because we’re a little thin early-mid Day3 (#126/169). It’s almost like the lack of Juniors and Covid and versatility effects of NIL has pushed some older/more experienced players from the College fray into the middle of this draft. Normally that might be deemed as a - not in a win now environment for the next 4 years imo. They’ve got that extra 1-2 years experience and look more pro ready for a 4th-5th rounder. I’ll finish be saying I’d stress getting at minimum 1 more stab in that early-mid Day3 area. Again even if we sweeten it with a #245 etc. I’m amazed at some of the draft options especially either side of 150 overall. McCormick, Limmer, Coleman, Jarrian Jones, Kalen King, Mustspha, Brade, Olodapo, Vaki the list goes on. Go ahead and pick an extra 1-2 on me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
tynimiller
Packer Fan in SD
GBkrzygrl
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: thequick12
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: thequick12
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Krabs
49 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:57 PM
College Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top