Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 Salary cap riddle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 991395"><p>The Packers could re-sign Love during the 2023 season if he proves to be a legit starter as well. That could result in his cap hit in 2024 being significantly lower than playing under the fifth-year option as well. The team took the same approach with Rodgers back in 2008.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers had to create some additional cap space to even get under the cap before March 15, so I don't consider any of those moves indicate anything about the direction they're headed at this point. I read somewhere that the front office approached Bakhtiari and Clark about restructuring their deals as well, that might mean they want to go all-in for at lest another year.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, the Packers can't restructure Rodgers' deal to significantly reduce his cap hit for the 2023 season without him agreeing to forgo some guaranteed money.</p><p></p><p>I just want to make it abundantly clear that I'm only speculating here. But I get the impression that the Packers would only want Rodgers back if he commits to playing at least another two seasons. In that case they could agree to pay him the guaranteed money over two years which would allow them to significantly reduce his cap hit for 2023.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 991395"] The Packers could re-sign Love during the 2023 season if he proves to be a legit starter as well. That could result in his cap hit in 2024 being significantly lower than playing under the fifth-year option as well. The team took the same approach with Rodgers back in 2008. The Packers had to create some additional cap space to even get under the cap before March 15, so I don't consider any of those moves indicate anything about the direction they're headed at this point. I read somewhere that the front office approached Bakhtiari and Clark about restructuring their deals as well, that might mean they want to go all-in for at lest another year. Once again, the Packers can't restructure Rodgers' deal to significantly reduce his cap hit for the 2023 season without him agreeing to forgo some guaranteed money. I just want to make it abundantly clear that I'm only speculating here. But I get the impression that the Packers would only want Rodgers back if he commits to playing at least another two seasons. In that case they could agree to pay him the guaranteed money over two years which would allow them to significantly reduce his cap hit for 2023. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 11:13 PM
College Sports
WNBA
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 8:06 PM
All Other Sports
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 5:27 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2023 Salary cap riddle
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top