Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2023 Round 2 pick #50: Jayden Reed WR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 997957" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>And to be clear-- I do believe that reaches happen. I believe that teams draft players a round+ earlier than they have guys rated because of need. And it could be that Jayden Reed is such an instance. We just don't know. </p><p></p><p>What makes no sense is to judge what is or is not a reach by judging against public perception. If the draft teaches us anything, year after year, it ought to be that the public and the league are not always on the same page. </p><p></p><p>If the Packers had taken Hyatt at #42, a lot of fans would be screaming "STEAL!!!" and yet the league as a whole allowed him to fall to #73. So was he a crazy steal, or did the professionals just not like him as much as the amateurs?</p><p></p><p>I'm inclined to think that the Packers had Reed highly rated for a few reasons:</p><p></p><p>1) He was not picked at the end of a run of WR's-- the top 5 had gone and they had their choice of everyone else in the class. They chose Reed.</p><p></p><p>2) Smart WR people seem to really love Reed. All Matt Harmon does is study college and NFL receivers. He loved Reed. </p><p></p><p>3) Gutekunst said that they traded back twice because they had so many prospects left that they really valued. Presumably Reed would be one of those.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 997957, member: 12283"] And to be clear-- I do believe that reaches happen. I believe that teams draft players a round+ earlier than they have guys rated because of need. And it could be that Jayden Reed is such an instance. We just don't know. What makes no sense is to judge what is or is not a reach by judging against public perception. If the draft teaches us anything, year after year, it ought to be that the public and the league are not always on the same page. If the Packers had taken Hyatt at #42, a lot of fans would be screaming "STEAL!!!" and yet the league as a whole allowed him to fall to #73. So was he a crazy steal, or did the professionals just not like him as much as the amateurs? I'm inclined to think that the Packers had Reed highly rated for a few reasons: 1) He was not picked at the end of a run of WR's-- the top 5 had gone and they had their choice of everyone else in the class. They chose Reed. 2) Smart WR people seem to really love Reed. All Matt Harmon does is study college and NFL receivers. He loved Reed. 3) Gutekunst said that they traded back twice because they had so many prospects left that they really valued. Presumably Reed would be one of those. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
31 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2023 Round 2 pick #50: Jayden Reed WR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top