Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Training Camp Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 964698" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Good stuff.</p><p>Whenever interpretation comes up on a particular word that a poster uses. I find it healthy to go to its previously, objective, agreed upon meaning. The dictionary.</p><p></p><p><strong>Unproven</strong></p><p></p><p><em>“of a new or alternate product/system or treatment. Not tried and tested”.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>“Not Demonstrated by evidence or argument to be true or existing”</em></p><p></p><p>In this case. I have demonstrated by reasonable argument and evidence (part of the definition itself) why that group designation is not appropriate. As far as “not tried or tested”. I don’t think that fits this group as a whole at all. If anything it’s a very pessimistic view of an otherwise solid TE group. In layman’s.. saying the Packers have an “<em>untested group of TE’s”</em> is reaching.</p><p></p><p> For anyone saying Tonyan is untested, I would ask why the Packers would offer a $3.759,000 contract to a 5th year player who is “not tried or tested” ??</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 964698, member: 10086"] Good stuff. Whenever interpretation comes up on a particular word that a poster uses. I find it healthy to go to its previously, objective, agreed upon meaning. The dictionary. [B]Unproven[/B] [I]“of a new or alternate product/system or treatment. Not tried and tested”. “Not Demonstrated by evidence or argument to be true or existing”[/I] In this case. I have demonstrated by reasonable argument and evidence (part of the definition itself) why that group designation is not appropriate. As far as “not tried or tested”. I don’t think that fits this group as a whole at all. If anything it’s a very pessimistic view of an otherwise solid TE group. In layman’s.. saying the Packers have an “[I]untested group of TE’s”[/I] is reaching. For anyone saying Tonyan is untested, I would ask why the Packers would offer a $3.759,000 contract to a 5th year player who is “not tried or tested” ?? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
H
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Heyjoe4
4 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Training Camp Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top