Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Salary Cap Riddle/Thread/Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 947006" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I know the FO means well with recent statements through Matt. However I can’t help by speculate that part of these public gestures about keeping Rodgers have several motivations.</p><p>One is that this isn’t the time to start a war with our QB. If he leaves we’d like to be on amicable terms. Which means the statements mean nothing more than we will make an attempt to keep him (big whoop who wouldn’t?). Placating Rodgers in a trade scenario Avenue is a bi-product of those statements. We don’t need to create a stalemate in a large scale business transaction, so to speak. We have to present a deal that enables the full team objective. and it’s going to take a velvet hammer as they say in the business world.</p><p></p><p>The only way I see this working out is if our FO is able to use increased contract years (through guaranteed) to convince Rodgers to take less per annual average. Trading long term security (risk) for a more team friendly monetary value. Also the Adams contract would more than likely have to be addressed simultaneously and we all know his contract is a biggie. Those combined would setup up a legitimate plea to offer a deal that otherwise might seem insulting.</p><p></p><p>If Rodgers doesn’t want a rebuild? Then it’s up to him to take a longer deal (but with less average yearly)</p><p>and possibly a higher % guaranteed (later contract out) as a perk. That enables Russ n Co to balance the books by providing our team with “known” financial variables with a 4-5 year outlook. It’s a time when the future league Cap increases should catch up with monies we pushed forward</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 947006, member: 10086"] I know the FO means well with recent statements through Matt. However I can’t help by speculate that part of these public gestures about keeping Rodgers have several motivations. One is that this isn’t the time to start a war with our QB. If he leaves we’d like to be on amicable terms. Which means the statements mean nothing more than we will make an attempt to keep him (big whoop who wouldn’t?). Placating Rodgers in a trade scenario Avenue is a bi-product of those statements. We don’t need to create a stalemate in a large scale business transaction, so to speak. We have to present a deal that enables the full team objective. and it’s going to take a velvet hammer as they say in the business world. The only way I see this working out is if our FO is able to use increased contract years (through guaranteed) to convince Rodgers to take less per annual average. Trading long term security (risk) for a more team friendly monetary value. Also the Adams contract would more than likely have to be addressed simultaneously and we all know his contract is a biggie. Those combined would setup up a legitimate plea to offer a deal that otherwise might seem insulting. If Rodgers doesn’t want a rebuild? Then it’s up to him to take a longer deal (but with less average yearly) and possibly a higher % guaranteed (later contract out) as a perk. That enables Russ n Co to balance the books by providing our team with “known” financial variables with a 4-5 year outlook. It’s a time when the future league Cap increases should catch up with monies we pushed forward [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Salary Cap Riddle/Thread/Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
