OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 17,319
- Reaction score
- 7,887
Plus just think about it. The teams that had the most draft capital statistically have an advantage in each draft. As an dramatic example, if we have:Based on Dator's rating I can now with full confidence ignore that moran for the rest of this lifetime.
Team A. Has 6 selections with zero top 40 selections and 4 of their 6 are Day3 selections across all rounds
Vs.
Team B. Has 10 selections, including 3 guys before pick #35 overall. Plus 7 more additional selections over Day 2-3.
How bad would you have to draft to earn a substantially lower group rating Team B?
I mean is Dator just a complete idiot .. or would it be far more likely that the draft class as a whole will be far more productive with more selections AND substantially earlier selections?
Dator has to be focused on several particular selections and not grading the group as a whole. That’s the only viable Defense and it’s not a good one. This Draft rating is an overall GROUP exercise, not individual drill. So he might just not be the sharpest in the shed


Last edited: