Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2020 Watchlist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackFan2" data-source="post: 870341" data-attributes="member: 10749"><p>My bad, that's bad comparison on my end but a much better comparison than to Funchess.</p><p></p><p>I think Van Jeff is similar to Lazard, the fact that they both have similar arm length, quicker than fast (but fast enough), reliable hands, both long striders in open field. Van Jeff is a better route runner than Lazard. Bodytype wise Lazard is much taller but lean.</p><p></p><p>Claypool bodywise is similar to Funchess & but Funchess does not use his size and length to his advantage. Claypool is more physical, faster and straight up bullies CB - we can't say the same about Funchess. Per bodywise sure Lazard is almost physically (heightwise) similar to Claypool but I have yet to see Lazard Physically dominate a CB like Claypool, even in college. I think Lazard has that potential though.</p><p></p><p>For Lazard I see a long-lean, slippery WR that <strong>has the potential to use that physicality</strong> to his advantage. Im actually more excited for Lazard (vs EQ) than whoever WR we're going to draft. Lazard has eerily physical measurement, testing, and play style to Marques Colston.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackFan2, post: 870341, member: 10749"] My bad, that's bad comparison on my end but a much better comparison than to Funchess. I think Van Jeff is similar to Lazard, the fact that they both have similar arm length, quicker than fast (but fast enough), reliable hands, both long striders in open field. Van Jeff is a better route runner than Lazard. Bodytype wise Lazard is much taller but lean. Claypool bodywise is similar to Funchess & but Funchess does not use his size and length to his advantage. Claypool is more physical, faster and straight up bullies CB - we can't say the same about Funchess. Per bodywise sure Lazard is almost physically (heightwise) similar to Claypool but I have yet to see Lazard Physically dominate a CB like Claypool, even in college. I think Lazard has that potential though. For Lazard I see a long-lean, slippery WR that [B]has the potential to use that physicality[/B] to his advantage. Im actually more excited for Lazard (vs EQ) than whoever WR we're going to draft. Lazard has eerily physical measurement, testing, and play style to Marques Colston. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2020 Watchlist
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top