Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 880264">That's pretty interesting.  Let's break it down.  In respect of NFL football as an entertainment there are reasons to be upset with this.  In respect of NFL football as a business, there's a question to be asked.  What other kind of business allows reporters in the room for operational strategy and tactic sessions, which is a large component of what is being worked out in these practices?  None.  I suppose you could demand they sign a non-disclosure agreement but then what's the point?This is not entirely new.  Teams, the Packers among them, have run closed practices in the past for the same reasons.  This takes it a step further.At least at this moment in time your Packer brain trust is acting like a business.  Whether reporters report or not, there is no direct impact on Packer revenue but it might have some impact on the ability to better execute strategy and tactics on the football field.Some might express dissatisfaction by not spending money with the Green Bay Packers.  If these measures result in more winning, others might spend more money with the Green Bay Packers.  From a business standpoint, I suppose the brain trust considers it a worthy trade-off.For the guys who make their living off clicks I suppose this puts a dent in their business model.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,013 (members: 0, guests: 1,013)