Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 876529" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>Wrong or right about the notion of having Love on a cheap rookie contract for the maximum amount of time, it is an unpredictable variable that you really shouldn't make your decisions around.  Otherwise, no team should pay a QB on a second contract or at least an expensive one.  Instead, they should just keep plugging rookies in.  Basically, finding a top QB and having him on a rookie contract for a year or 2 is bonus, but not one I would weigh too heavy when we are talking about needing a starter in the next 3-5 years or even possibly sooner if things don't go as planned.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 552 (members: 0, guests: 552)