Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 876347" data-attributes="member: 7261">While I get what you are saying, the words "improved their chances for the 2020 season" can't be stressed enough.  If all you are wanting to do is take a swing at short term improvement, with low importance on long term, I tend to agree with you on the Love pick.  One also needs to acknowledge that had the Packers used the pick on say a WR, there is no guarantees on that pick helping immediately or long term either.Last years draft is a good example of what can play out in a draft, in the first round no less.The Packers select EDGE Gary with the 12th pick and S Savage with the 21st pick.  First of all, had they selected Savage with the 12th and Gary with the 21st, people would have lost their "sh*t" about reaching for Savage and some probably would have called Gary great value at 21.  Hell, some called Savage a reach at 21.Fast forward a year.  So far Gary looks like a meh pick, that we will have to wait another year or 2 to see how it works out and Savage appears to be a great pick.  So saying Love was a "bad pick" because he doesn't immediately improve the 2020 team might be a correct statement on the surface, but it really doesn't look at the big picture how that pick or other picks may or may not impact the future of the Packers.</blockquote>

Total: 221 (members: 1, guests: 220)