Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 872719" data-attributes="member: 12283">If people want to like the pick, there are things in Love's film and in the reports about him that will allow them to do so.If people want to hate the pick, there are things in Love's film and in the reports about him that will allow them to do so.Gutekunst and LaFleur liked what they saw enough to make the investment. Simply because they think that doesn't mean it's going to work out by any means. But they went for it, and now their legacies with Green Bay are tied to this investment.But what is just flat out wrong are the takes that this kid has no redeeming qualities or that anyone could watch his film and see he will never work.It's also important to realize that a lot of the metrics, while they seem cut and dry, are actually more subjective than you'd think. PFF thinks Love was supremely inaccurate. The Athletic posted a graphic that showed Love was 2nd behind only Burrow in accuracy %, saying that 90% of his passes beyond the LOS were catchable.I'm not saying one is right or one is wrong. I'm just saying that it's not that simple.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 463 (members: 0, guests: 463)