Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 865963" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Oh? How much stock am I putting into it? I had a number of things to say about Hooper, 3rd down performance being one of them. </p><p></p><p>I actually agree with you. Apart from unrealistic options who will either get tagged, resigned, or cost too much (i.e. Cooper and Henry), Hooper is probably legitimately one of the best options.</p><p></p><p>However, I would say that reflects more on how poor this pool of FA options is than Hooper's quality as a FA target. </p><p></p><p>Hooper is a mediocre blocker and a safety valve of a receiver. He gets a lot of targets very close to the LOS, thus pumping up his catch % with high percentage passes, and he isn't effective gaining yards or first downs after the catch. So he's essentially just a guy at the position. I don't think the Packers would be doing themselves a favor by making him the league's highest paid TE. </p><p></p><p>Gute already made a mediocre TE the highest paid player at his position and we have basically been counting down the days since until we could cut him and get out from under his contract. Why do that again?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 865963, member: 12283"] Oh? How much stock am I putting into it? I had a number of things to say about Hooper, 3rd down performance being one of them. I actually agree with you. Apart from unrealistic options who will either get tagged, resigned, or cost too much (i.e. Cooper and Henry), Hooper is probably legitimately one of the best options. However, I would say that reflects more on how poor this pool of FA options is than Hooper's quality as a FA target. Hooper is a mediocre blocker and a safety valve of a receiver. He gets a lot of targets very close to the LOS, thus pumping up his catch % with high percentage passes, and he isn't effective gaining yards or first downs after the catch. So he's essentially just a guy at the position. I don't think the Packers would be doing themselves a favor by making him the league's highest paid TE. Gute already made a mediocre TE the highest paid player at his position and we have basically been counting down the days since until we could cut him and get out from under his contract. Why do that again? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
rmontro
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top