Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 863142" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>That is where your issue vs. my thoughts aren't lining up. I never stated to what degree it would be better, shoot...you could sign two high flying FA's and both bust and the position is worse, there is no guarantee. </p><p></p><p>However, I'm not buying that given the scenario you described in your response: Signed Begelton, bring in a draft pick (let's assume 3rd round or better), Lazard/Kumerow/ESB/MVS another year AND also Adams. How does that not mean improved? </p><p></p><p>Begelton alone has proved arguably more than anyone in that room at the professional level than Adams and some could argue Lazard (his tiny sample size is at least against NFL). </p><p></p><p>EQ, showed the same promise Lazard started to the end of his rookie campaign crawling from the bowels of the depth chart to truly being a target by Rodgers...the question is does he continue to progress or regress like GMo or MVS? </p><p></p><p>Speaking of MVS...letting him sit at the #4 or so spot on the chart removes that pressure of being asked to be the #2 and do we see him progress finally? I'm also of the mindset coming from the small conference he did...being a one trick pony like he was...and a brand new offensive system...was he overwhelmed even before the Packers basically said be our #2?</p><p></p><p>Then you got Lazard...I like this kid and truly think he can be a solid #3 and push a team's #2...but he is NOT what I want our #2 to be. </p><p></p><p>It all comes back to how do you define or what measuring stick are we weighing our thoughts towards...you declaring if it is a "ton" of improvement if that all played out vs saying it is an improved WR corps are entirely different to some and identically the same to others. Is that scenario ideal....not in my opinion. I'd LOVE to see us dabble in WR free agency AND get a WR with one of our first two picks, between a FA veteran and a higher profile draft pick our #2 I think is solved for 2020...and I feel the fall out of this is better growth out of guys like Lazard and MVS and Begelton and EQ as they don't feel the weight of the franchise looming on them opposite of Adams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 863142, member: 6578"] That is where your issue vs. my thoughts aren't lining up. I never stated to what degree it would be better, shoot...you could sign two high flying FA's and both bust and the position is worse, there is no guarantee. However, I'm not buying that given the scenario you described in your response: Signed Begelton, bring in a draft pick (let's assume 3rd round or better), Lazard/Kumerow/ESB/MVS another year AND also Adams. How does that not mean improved? Begelton alone has proved arguably more than anyone in that room at the professional level than Adams and some could argue Lazard (his tiny sample size is at least against NFL). EQ, showed the same promise Lazard started to the end of his rookie campaign crawling from the bowels of the depth chart to truly being a target by Rodgers...the question is does he continue to progress or regress like GMo or MVS? Speaking of MVS...letting him sit at the #4 or so spot on the chart removes that pressure of being asked to be the #2 and do we see him progress finally? I'm also of the mindset coming from the small conference he did...being a one trick pony like he was...and a brand new offensive system...was he overwhelmed even before the Packers basically said be our #2? Then you got Lazard...I like this kid and truly think he can be a solid #3 and push a team's #2...but he is NOT what I want our #2 to be. It all comes back to how do you define or what measuring stick are we weighing our thoughts towards...you declaring if it is a "ton" of improvement if that all played out vs saying it is an improved WR corps are entirely different to some and identically the same to others. Is that scenario ideal....not in my opinion. I'd LOVE to see us dabble in WR free agency AND get a WR with one of our first two picks, between a FA veteran and a higher profile draft pick our #2 I think is solved for 2020...and I feel the fall out of this is better growth out of guys like Lazard and MVS and Begelton and EQ as they don't feel the weight of the franchise looming on them opposite of Adams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Schultz
SudsMcBucky
Magooch
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 12:01 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 10:10 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Yesterday at 4:38 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2020 Offseason
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
