Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 852463" data-attributes="member: 7261">Oh I agree with you.  Although, after week 2, nobody probably would have predicted that the Packers would be sitting at 8-2, 9 weeks later.  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" />   Fitz (a safety) wasn't necessarily a player/position that the Packers absolutely needed to improve at the time.  So trading a first rounder for him, probably would have been a luxury that we shouldn't have spent a future pick on.  My point was, if that opportunity ever comes along for the Packers and its for a guy that instantly fixes a position of obvious need and he is sitting there on his second year of his rookie deal, I am in favor of getting an almost sure thing in exchange for a not so sure thing (future first round pick).</blockquote>

Total: 757 (members: 3, guests: 754)