Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NelsonsLongCatch" data-source="post: 711209" data-attributes="member: 1407"><p>I see this argument used each year and I hate it.  I keep hearing "with the Packers several positions of need to address, $40M in cap space isn't as much as it might seem".  First, a team that was 60 minutes from the Super Bowl shouldn't have "several positions of need".  Second, the Packers could some of the cap space to address some of their needs.  It's apparent that the needs aren't being addressed through the draft.  I also like to always point out the following:  What young talent do the Packers have on the roster right now that is going to warrant big contract extensions?  The Packers don't have an Antonio Brown, Le'Veon Bell, or JJ Watt type player that is going to break the bank.  Each year the Packers are the king's of the salary cap rollover, but seem to have the same needs year after year after year.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 1,151 (members: 2, guests: 1,149)