Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 476581" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>So, the Best Player Available doesn't mean the best player that is available? A player who is better than other players.</p><p> </p><p>You believe in tiers as 'makes too much sense' but if you select in a tier, if the player is at a need position, he no longer is as good as another player in the same tier.</p><p> </p><p>Personally, I think you are yanking my chain at this point.</p><p> </p><p>You seem to think that BPA and Need are mutually exclusive. Of course that is silly, it's the same player whether you need him or not.</p><p> </p><p>Bob: Hey, Ed, I bought a car!</p><p>Ed: Hey Bob, congrats!</p><p>Bob: Its red.</p><p>Ed: So, you didn't buy a car? You bought something red? I thought you were going to buy a car?</p><p>Bob: I bought a car, it happens to be red.</p><p>Ed: Nope, you didn't buy a car, you bought something that is red. How can it be a car if its red?</p><p> </p><p>As far as weak link theory, it is partly true, I feel. But the playmaker theory also has its merits and is a bigger issue. Rodgers makes people around him better. Our OLine sucks but teams don't blitz as much as they should because Rodgers will capitalize on less coverage. So I prefer a team with some 6s, mostly 7s and some 8s and a couple of 10s.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 476581, member: 2846"] So, the Best Player Available doesn't mean the best player that is available? A player who is better than other players. You believe in tiers as 'makes too much sense' but if you select in a tier, if the player is at a need position, he no longer is as good as another player in the same tier. Personally, I think you are yanking my chain at this point. You seem to think that BPA and Need are mutually exclusive. Of course that is silly, it's the same player whether you need him or not. Bob: Hey, Ed, I bought a car! Ed: Hey Bob, congrats! Bob: Its red. Ed: So, you didn't buy a car? You bought something red? I thought you were going to buy a car? Bob: I bought a car, it happens to be red. Ed: Nope, you didn't buy a car, you bought something that is red. How can it be a car if its red? As far as weak link theory, it is partly true, I feel. But the playmaker theory also has its merits and is a bigger issue. Rodgers makes people around him better. Our OLine sucks but teams don't blitz as much as they should because Rodgers will capitalize on less coverage. So I prefer a team with some 6s, mostly 7s and some 8s and a couple of 10s. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Latest posts
R
NFC North Predictions
Latest: rmontro
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 12:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Packers Trade Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
Yesterday at 2:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 1:03 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: weeds
Thursday at 7:27 PM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top