Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 475603" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">A lot has been written on this forum about BPA. I’ve emphasized the idea of talent tiers in the draft and IMO there’s a lot of evidence Thompson adheres to that principle and IMO does so as much or more than any other GM. Again just my opinion but trading up or down is evidence of that. Clearly when a GM trades up in the draft he’s trading up for BPA and when he trades down he’s recognizing there’s a pool of relatively equal talent – not one stand out that fits his team’s needs – and the GM wants to get two picks in that pool or get more in the next. Of course a team’s current roster plays into how the draft board is constructed. For example, it would be idiotic for any team to engineer a massive trade up for a franchise QB if they already have one. But in the upcoming draft in the first round if there’s a NT-type that has a grade at the top of the current tier – or at the bottom of the “upper” tier I’ll bet Thompson pulls the trigger on it. Thompson has said more than once, ’God only makes so many talented big men’. </span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Please explain. To find a substantive comment by Ted Thompson on anything is difficult enough, to find one of him expressing regret would be a real find. I’m interested in the evidence you are basing this opinion on. Thompson traded up 3 times in the last draft. He traded picks #59 and #123 for #51 and selected Worthy. He then traded #90 and #163 for #62 and picked Hayward. His last trade-up was using one sixth rounder and two seventh rounders to get his original 5th rounder back to select Terrell Manning. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Thompson had two comp picks at the end of the seventh round so he didn’t hurt himself at all IMO by trading up for Manning. While Manning hasn’t contributed much, we’ve learned he had a debilitating illness during TC that set him back. We’ll see what he can do next season - I can’t see a reason to be disappointed in the Manning trade-up at this point. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">If the Casey Hayward pick doesn’t qualify as a grand slam home run at this point, it certainly looks like a three-run homer. It’s early but Thompson has to be elated about that trade-up, doesn’t he? </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Jerel Worthy was the most expensive trade-up and he has not provided the consistent inside pass rush we all – and Thompson – were hoping for when that trade-up occurred. But he’s surprised (at least me) by playing the run as well as he has. While he’s provided quality depth on the DL, I expect more pass rush from him and we could very well see it next season. Thompson used fourth round pick #123 to trade up 8 spots to take Worthy. But Thompson had two comp picks after the fourth round and picked Daniels and McMillian 9 and 10 spots after pick #123 he had traded away. IMO it’s likely those two players were on the same talent tier as the players they would have considered at #123. IOW, I don’t think Thompson has any reason to “hate himself” for trading up in the last draft. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 475603, member: 4300"] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]A lot has been written on this forum about BPA. I’ve emphasized the idea of talent tiers in the draft and IMO there’s a lot of evidence Thompson adheres to that principle and IMO does so as much or more than any other GM. Again just my opinion but trading up or down is evidence of that. Clearly when a GM trades up in the draft he’s trading up for BPA and when he trades down he’s recognizing there’s a pool of relatively equal talent – not one stand out that fits his team’s needs – and the GM wants to get two picks in that pool or get more in the next. Of course a team’s current roster plays into how the draft board is constructed. For example, it would be idiotic for any team to engineer a massive trade up for a franchise QB if they already have one. But in the upcoming draft in the first round if there’s a NT-type that has a grade at the top of the current tier – or at the bottom of the “upper” tier I’ll bet Thompson pulls the trigger on it. Thompson has said more than once, ’God only makes so many talented big men’. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]Please explain. To find a substantive comment by Ted Thompson on anything is difficult enough, to find one of him expressing regret would be a real find. I’m interested in the evidence you are basing this opinion on. Thompson traded up 3 times in the last draft. He traded picks #59 and #123 for #51 and selected Worthy. He then traded #90 and #163 for #62 and picked Hayward. His last trade-up was using one sixth rounder and two seventh rounders to get his original 5th rounder back to select Terrell Manning. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]Thompson had two comp picks at the end of the seventh round so he didn’t hurt himself at all IMO by trading up for Manning. While Manning hasn’t contributed much, we’ve learned he had a debilitating illness during TC that set him back. We’ll see what he can do next season - I can’t see a reason to be disappointed in the Manning trade-up at this point. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]If the Casey Hayward pick doesn’t qualify as a grand slam home run at this point, it certainly looks like a three-run homer. It’s early but Thompson has to be elated about that trade-up, doesn’t he? [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Tahoma]Jerel Worthy was the most expensive trade-up and he has not provided the consistent inside pass rush we all – and Thompson – were hoping for when that trade-up occurred. But he’s surprised (at least me) by playing the run as well as he has. While he’s provided quality depth on the DL, I expect more pass rush from him and we could very well see it next season. Thompson used fourth round pick #123 to trade up 8 spots to take Worthy. But Thompson had two comp picks after the fourth round and picked Daniels and McMillian 9 and 10 spots after pick #123 he had traded away. IMO it’s likely those two players were on the same talent tier as the players they would have considered at #123. IOW, I don’t think Thompson has any reason to “hate himself” for trading up in the last draft. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
WNBA
Latest: Voyageur
A moment ago
All Other Sports
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: OldSchool101
21 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: milani
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
Today at 5:27 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 5:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2013 needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top