Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1/3 of the way through the season takeaways
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 741391" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>I looked through the first four weeks of injury reports and noted how many players each team had marked Doubtful or Out for each game. This method is imperfect, as it doesn't account for IR,sometimes Questionable players don't play and (far less often) Doubtful players do suit up, and it doesn't account for guys lost mid-game (e.g. Nelson/Daniels starting but only playing 7 snaps). But in a limited amount of time, it was the easiest way for me to come up with some sort of quantification. </p><p></p><p>There was only one team, Indianapolis (13) that had more starters marked Doubtful or Out through the first four weeks than the Packers (9 if you don't count Ryan as a starter). Arizona also had 9 and Houston had 7. FYI, this number for GB does not include injuries to backups (Murphy, Brooks, Spriggs, Ryan, etc). </p><p></p><p>Again, this isn't exact and I know that a few teams (e.g. Ravens) have some important players on IR. However, it does illustrate the original point, which was simply that GB has dealt with more injury to starters than most teams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 741391, member: 12283"] I looked through the first four weeks of injury reports and noted how many players each team had marked Doubtful or Out for each game. This method is imperfect, as it doesn't account for IR,sometimes Questionable players don't play and (far less often) Doubtful players do suit up, and it doesn't account for guys lost mid-game (e.g. Nelson/Daniels starting but only playing 7 snaps). But in a limited amount of time, it was the easiest way for me to come up with some sort of quantification. There was only one team, Indianapolis (13) that had more starters marked Doubtful or Out through the first four weeks than the Packers (9 if you don't count Ryan as a starter). Arizona also had 9 and Houston had 7. FYI, this number for GB does not include injuries to backups (Murphy, Brooks, Spriggs, Ryan, etc). Again, this isn't exact and I know that a few teams (e.g. Ravens) have some important players on IR. However, it does illustrate the original point, which was simply that GB has dealt with more injury to starters than most teams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
GreenBaySlacker
ExpatPacker
sschind
Latest posts
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: GreenNGold_81
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: sschind
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenNGold_81
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1/3 of the way through the season takeaways
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top