Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 741360" data-attributes="member: 12283">The Chiefs have had serious losses thus far. However, during the first month of the season they didn't deal with as much as the Packers. They were without Ehinger for the first three weeks, Morse for weeks 3-4, and Ford for week 4. This is in addition to the loss of Berry, as you mentioned. The Packers didn't have Bakhtiari for weeks 2-4; Bulaga for weeks 1, 2, & 4; Daniels for weeks 2-4 (minus 7 snaps); Nelson for all but 7 snaps in week 2; Cobb, House, Brice, Perry, and Ryan in week 3. There just isn't any comparison there.And if we're going to bring up their kicker, then I'll mention that the Packers were also without the backups to Bakhtiari and Bulaga for much of September. No one is saying that the Packers were alone in dealing with injuries or in bad shape moving forward. I was merely pointing out that they dealt with more than most teams to start the season and came through it well. That's literally it. I'm still baffled that it could be this controversial.</blockquote>

Total: 111 (members: 3, guests: 108)