Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Would you lose your mind?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 552843" data-attributes="member: 2846"><p>Symantics, I suppose. If you are taking a player rated 93, and there are 4 other players tied at 93, nobody has a higher value, then you are taking BPA. If it happens to be a position of perceived need, it does not change the fact that he is BPA.</p><p></p><p>The guy who came up with BVA (at least the first I read it) contended that 'the BPA may not fit the Packers system.' Therefore the Packers should pass and get the next best player who fits the system. My question to him was, 'How would a player that doesn't fit the Packers system get rated higher than someone who does?' He did not respond. Based on other writings of his, I think he was under the impression there was one definitive list of player rankings that all teams pretty much accepted. Establishing who was #134 and that he was measurably better than player #135. As this is my introduction to the term, BVA, I have found it unnecessary and unfounded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AmishMafia, post: 552843, member: 2846"] Symantics, I suppose. If you are taking a player rated 93, and there are 4 other players tied at 93, nobody has a higher value, then you are taking BPA. If it happens to be a position of perceived need, it does not change the fact that he is BPA. The guy who came up with BVA (at least the first I read it) contended that 'the BPA may not fit the Packers system.' Therefore the Packers should pass and get the next best player who fits the system. My question to him was, 'How would a player that doesn't fit the Packers system get rated higher than someone who does?' He did not respond. Based on other writings of his, I think he was under the impression there was one definitive list of player rankings that all teams pretty much accepted. Establishing who was #134 and that he was measurably better than player #135. As this is my introduction to the term, BVA, I have found it unnecessary and unfounded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
4Ever4Favre
ExpatPacker
PikeBadger
tynimiller
GreenBaySlacker
scheeler
DoURant
Packermudgeon
Team Ronny
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
30 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Would you lose your mind?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top