Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
When Posters Insist on Disregarding 2010 When Analyzing TT...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ogsponge" data-source="post: 540820" data-attributes="member: 9358"><p>What? Me and my ilk? Your opening statement is hilarious, I clearly point out an issue with certain posters on this board that feel the need to get down on anyone that criticizes TT, how do you respond? By grouping me, a poster who has been on this board for 7 months, as part of some "ilk". Pray tell me, did you read my post? Because if you had I don't know how you could possibly feel the need to give your condescending reader's guide to me and my ilk. If you had read my post you would understand that my ilk believes TT deserves tons of credit and praise for the things he has done well including building a Super Bowl winning team, but also deserves criticism concerning his failures on the defensive side of the ball.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? Were you truly able to keep a straight face while typing this entire post? If you believe everything you say above is true, why do you even feel the need to defend it? If you believe all of the above than you actually fall squarely in line with me and my "ilk".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Please show me where in my post I said there is something wrong with TT and the way he does business? The only thing you will find, is that he has failed rather badly on the defensive side of the ball. Nowhere in my entire post do I even imply there is something wrong with the way he does business.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely, we have a great offensive team which is always going to give us a "chance", however the current incarnation of our defense (through this year) has never been good enough to give us more than a "chance"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, again, please point anywhere in my post that I even remotely suggested anything contrary to this effect?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed but again, I don't think you read my post which clearly stated that most posters seem to fall to the extremes</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, again did you read my post? Read my previous comment again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed what does that have anything to with anything I said in my original post?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sigh, agreed, I am starting to feel like a broken record but once again I will ask, did you read my post?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did I ever say that?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is going to be</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>LEGEN</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>wait for it...</p><p></p><p>Did you even read my post?</p><p></p><p><strong>DARY</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And therein lies the problem, what you perceive as heavy criticism, is just criticism of a certain area with this team (the defense) that is failing miserably. At least as far as my post is concerned. Did you happened to, I don't know read my post?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, did I suggest otherwise?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would never presume to consider what he thinks about while being one of the best GM's in football but I am sure those are a few of his many thoughts concerning building a winning team.</p><p></p><p>In closing after going through your entire post, I am fully convinced you did not bother to read a word I said because absolutely nothing you typed up had anything to do with anything I said. The funny part is that we are in agreement on nearly everything yet you wrote this gigantic novel in defense of a point of view that you apparently are not even part of?</p><p></p><p>One last time, did you read my original post?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ogsponge, post: 540820, member: 9358"] What? Me and my ilk? Your opening statement is hilarious, I clearly point out an issue with certain posters on this board that feel the need to get down on anyone that criticizes TT, how do you respond? By grouping me, a poster who has been on this board for 7 months, as part of some "ilk". Pray tell me, did you read my post? Because if you had I don't know how you could possibly feel the need to give your condescending reader's guide to me and my ilk. If you had read my post you would understand that my ilk believes TT deserves tons of credit and praise for the things he has done well including building a Super Bowl winning team, but also deserves criticism concerning his failures on the defensive side of the ball. Really? Were you truly able to keep a straight face while typing this entire post? If you believe everything you say above is true, why do you even feel the need to defend it? If you believe all of the above than you actually fall squarely in line with me and my "ilk". Please show me where in my post I said there is something wrong with TT and the way he does business? The only thing you will find, is that he has failed rather badly on the defensive side of the ball. Nowhere in my entire post do I even imply there is something wrong with the way he does business. Agreed Absolutely, we have a great offensive team which is always going to give us a "chance", however the current incarnation of our defense (through this year) has never been good enough to give us more than a "chance" Agreed Agreed, again, please point anywhere in my post that I even remotely suggested anything contrary to this effect? Agreed but again, I don't think you read my post which clearly stated that most posters seem to fall to the extremes Agreed, again did you read my post? Read my previous comment again. Agreed what does that have anything to with anything I said in my original post? Sigh, agreed, I am starting to feel like a broken record but once again I will ask, did you read my post? Did I ever say that? This is going to be [B] LEGEN [/B] wait for it... Did you even read my post? [B]DARY[/B] And therein lies the problem, what you perceive as heavy criticism, is just criticism of a certain area with this team (the defense) that is failing miserably. At least as far as my post is concerned. Did you happened to, I don't know read my post? Agreed, did I suggest otherwise? I would never presume to consider what he thinks about while being one of the best GM's in football but I am sure those are a few of his many thoughts concerning building a winning team. In closing after going through your entire post, I am fully convinced you did not bother to read a word I said because absolutely nothing you typed up had anything to do with anything I said. The funny part is that we are in agreement on nearly everything yet you wrote this gigantic novel in defense of a point of view that you apparently are not even part of? One last time, did you read my original post? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
gopkrs
ExpatPacker
Emur
txj
GreenBaySlacker
Packer Fan in SD
DoURant
sschind
griffin
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenNGold_81
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
4 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
52 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
When Posters Insist on Disregarding 2010 When Analyzing TT...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top