Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Westbrook Vs. McCluster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 279517" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>NONONO, don't get me wrong. I think Iupati would be a great pick, if, like you said, there isn't any LT worthy left.</p><p></p><p>10 pounds is a lot. If Charles Brown had played under 310 pounds instead of 290, his stock would be up there with Okung.</p><p></p><p>But nobody said he can't drop it. All of his problems are due to Idaho being a small school. He's very much coachable, and his upside is tremenduous. When he played in his level of competition, he completely dominated. With one year to lose weight, gain agility and learn how to better block, he could be a force in the middle like Snee.</p><p></p><p>My point is, right now, he probably could start in Phi or Pitt's scheme, but he probably couldn't in ours, that's why I said he's a sexier pick to them. My intention wasn't to say he just doesn't fit our scheme...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 279517, member: 1429"] NONONO, don't get me wrong. I think Iupati would be a great pick, if, like you said, there isn't any LT worthy left. 10 pounds is a lot. If Charles Brown had played under 310 pounds instead of 290, his stock would be up there with Okung. But nobody said he can't drop it. All of his problems are due to Idaho being a small school. He's very much coachable, and his upside is tremenduous. When he played in his level of competition, he completely dominated. With one year to lose weight, gain agility and learn how to better block, he could be a force in the middle like Snee. My point is, right now, he probably could start in Phi or Pitt's scheme, but he probably couldn't in ours, that's why I said he's a sexier pick to them. My intention wasn't to say he just doesn't fit our scheme... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Moving Up
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Backed Into A Corner?
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Packer Fan in SD
Yesterday at 8:54 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Westbrook Vs. McCluster
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top