Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Well-Rounded Prospects
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 951202" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>I had a thought the other day. I wondered what would happen in terms of hit rate if you reduced a board down to exclusively guys who checked the boxes in regards to film, athleticism, and production. Obviously it's common sense that if a guy has all three of those working for them, they're probably pretty good, but the problem is how do you quantify it? So what I propose to do it post lists of various prospects who meet all of the following criteria:</p><p></p><p>-A draft grade of 6.20 or higher from Lance Zierlein, or being ranked in the top 100 by Jeremiah, Brugler, or PFF (basically checking this box means that someone who has a reasonable idea of what they're watching thought you looked good on tape).</p><p></p><p>-A RAS of 8.0 or better.</p><p></p><p>-At least two years of minimum acceptable production (to be determined by position).</p><p></p><p>My contention isn't that these are the only guys we should draft, but I'm curious for future reference how strong the hit rate will be on these lists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 951202, member: 12283"] I had a thought the other day. I wondered what would happen in terms of hit rate if you reduced a board down to exclusively guys who checked the boxes in regards to film, athleticism, and production. Obviously it's common sense that if a guy has all three of those working for them, they're probably pretty good, but the problem is how do you quantify it? So what I propose to do it post lists of various prospects who meet all of the following criteria: -A draft grade of 6.20 or higher from Lance Zierlein, or being ranked in the top 100 by Jeremiah, Brugler, or PFF (basically checking this box means that someone who has a reasonable idea of what they're watching thought you looked good on tape). -A RAS of 8.0 or better. -At least two years of minimum acceptable production (to be determined by position). My contention isn't that these are the only guys we should draft, but I'm curious for future reference how strong the hit rate will be on these lists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
I had This Nightmare
Latest: milani
29 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 4, pick 111: Evan Williams, S, Oregon
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Well-Rounded Prospects
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top