Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Was it really worth it to let Matt Flynn go?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 516759" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>What's wrong with wanting Matt Flynn back for the right price? The Vikings need a <u><strong>starting</strong></u> quarterback. We need a <u><strong>backup</strong></u> quarterback. BIG difference. The central question that should be easy for Packers brass to make is if what they had in Matt Flynn through 2011 was better or worse than the Seneca Wallace that they've seen over the past five weeks. I'm not sure that any of us know the answer since none of us have seen a pass out of Wallace. All that us fans have is recent memories of games played by both QBs when they were with other teams and other offenses.</p><p></p><p>All offseason and throughout camp we argued about whether Harrell or Coleman could go in and win a game if AR went down. At least as of 2011, we knew that Flynn could do it. Do we all have the same confidence in Wallace? That's tough for any of us to know except those that have seen him in practice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 516759, member: 5830"] What's wrong with wanting Matt Flynn back for the right price? The Vikings need a [U][B]starting[/B][/U] quarterback. We need a [U][B]backup[/B][/U] quarterback. BIG difference. The central question that should be easy for Packers brass to make is if what they had in Matt Flynn through 2011 was better or worse than the Seneca Wallace that they've seen over the past five weeks. I'm not sure that any of us know the answer since none of us have seen a pass out of Wallace. All that us fans have is recent memories of games played by both QBs when they were with other teams and other offenses. All offseason and throughout camp we argued about whether Harrell or Coleman could go in and win a game if AR went down. At least as of 2011, we knew that Flynn could do it. Do we all have the same confidence in Wallace? That's tough for any of us to know except those that have seen him in practice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
28 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
34 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
56 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Was it really worth it to let Matt Flynn go?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top