Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wahle / Rivera ... FINAL TAKE.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TomAllen" data-source="post: 91215" data-attributes="member: 581"><p>I think that if TT kept Wahle last year then he wouldn't have had to draft and sign via FA so many offensive lineman to see if they would stick on the o-line (which they haven't, by the way.). He could have drafted 1 or 2 players as utility lineman for depth, and signed a vet to fill the remaining o-guard spot. He already would have had Clifton, Wahle, Wells, Moll (or whoever won the job), & Tauscher. </p><p></p><p>RB's--no need there</p><p>WR--draft Jennings and sign a better Vet. Should have gotten Lelie from Denver in the Javon Walker fiasco, or Moulds from Buffalo.</p><p></p><p>That leaves primarily the defensive side of the ball with plenty of room in which TT could have concentrated on in the draft, and select FA's. </p><p></p><p>What is so hard to understand about this scenario?</p><p></p><p>This way, Favre has protection. The Pack would have a running game, and thereby a passing game. And TT would be pretty much in the same postion he was in this year in order to build the defense. And in good shape going into next year!</p><p></p><p>and oh yeah...he should have tried harder to keep Bates!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TomAllen, post: 91215, member: 581"] I think that if TT kept Wahle last year then he wouldn't have had to draft and sign via FA so many offensive lineman to see if they would stick on the o-line (which they haven't, by the way.). He could have drafted 1 or 2 players as utility lineman for depth, and signed a vet to fill the remaining o-guard spot. He already would have had Clifton, Wahle, Wells, Moll (or whoever won the job), & Tauscher. RB's--no need there WR--draft Jennings and sign a better Vet. Should have gotten Lelie from Denver in the Javon Walker fiasco, or Moulds from Buffalo. That leaves primarily the defensive side of the ball with plenty of room in which TT could have concentrated on in the draft, and select FA's. What is so hard to understand about this scenario? This way, Favre has protection. The Pack would have a running game, and thereby a passing game. And TT would be pretty much in the same postion he was in this year in order to build the defense. And in good shape going into next year! and oh yeah...he should have tried harder to keep Bates! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
tynimiller
DoURant
Latest posts
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 4:00 PM
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 2:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wahle / Rivera ... FINAL TAKE.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top