Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
This NEEDS TO BE READ RODGERS ARTICLE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="randymoonsthepacks" data-source="post: 294123" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>Finally, a legitimate response. And truthfully, I would rather be in our position. I think that we have better receivers than you (when we are all healthy) especially if we trade for Vincent Jackson, a better overall defense (when we are healthy), a better oline (if not by much), and obviously a better running game. Sure the QB is a HUGE question mark going into next season, but I have a feeling if we don't sign Mcnabb next offseason then we will draft a QB in the first round. I honestly believe that a rookie QB would be able to succeed on our team from the get go. I don't remember the last time a rookie QB would have started for a team with as many weapons as we have. Our O-line is generally young except for our left side (which is vastly over rated IMO), and we have the potential to have a very good secondary (minus the safeties of course).</p><p></p><p>If the Vikings address the QB situation and our safeties can step it up (they are all very young except Madieu), the Packer/Viking rivalry will be extremely relevant to the NFL for years to come.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="randymoonsthepacks, post: 294123, member: 1912"] Finally, a legitimate response. And truthfully, I would rather be in our position. I think that we have better receivers than you (when we are all healthy) especially if we trade for Vincent Jackson, a better overall defense (when we are healthy), a better oline (if not by much), and obviously a better running game. Sure the QB is a HUGE question mark going into next season, but I have a feeling if we don't sign Mcnabb next offseason then we will draft a QB in the first round. I honestly believe that a rookie QB would be able to succeed on our team from the get go. I don't remember the last time a rookie QB would have started for a team with as many weapons as we have. Our O-line is generally young except for our left side (which is vastly over rated IMO), and we have the potential to have a very good secondary (minus the safeties of course). If the Vikings address the QB situation and our safeties can step it up (they are all very young except Madieu), the Packer/Viking rivalry will be extremely relevant to the NFL for years to come. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Packer Fan in SD
Today at 6:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 6:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Schultz
Today at 4:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 1:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
This NEEDS TO BE READ RODGERS ARTICLE
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top