Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
'Splain this one Lucy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voyageur" data-source="post: 958368" data-attributes="member: 17953"><p>You can only afford to hold on to so many young players whose salary demands are outrageous, and quite frankly, that's where the majority of them are going with the best players in the league. The problem is, those outrageous salaries only supply one body on the field, and sometimes you have to sacrifice one player rated at 95, using a 75 in his place, so you can upgrade three other positions where you've been stuck at 35, and can raise them to 75, using the money difference between the 75 and 95 to do it.</p><p></p><p>That's a -20, when you lose the 95, but you can get a return of +80, and a net return of +60. That's the logic in making deals like they did with Adams. They believe they can get that kind of net return from it.</p><p></p><p>As to who the core players are, and keeping them, the objective is that you expand the core to guy that you can lock in for a series of years to give your team more potential to win, not saddle yourself with a couple of super stars who can't win games alone. I'm afraid that's pretty much where we'd gone, by not upgrading the defense when they should have, and paying attention to special teams.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voyageur, post: 958368, member: 17953"] You can only afford to hold on to so many young players whose salary demands are outrageous, and quite frankly, that's where the majority of them are going with the best players in the league. The problem is, those outrageous salaries only supply one body on the field, and sometimes you have to sacrifice one player rated at 95, using a 75 in his place, so you can upgrade three other positions where you've been stuck at 35, and can raise them to 75, using the money difference between the 75 and 95 to do it. That's a -20, when you lose the 95, but you can get a return of +80, and a net return of +60. That's the logic in making deals like they did with Adams. They believe they can get that kind of net return from it. As to who the core players are, and keeping them, the objective is that you expand the core to guy that you can lock in for a series of years to give your team more potential to win, not saddle yourself with a couple of super stars who can't win games alone. I'm afraid that's pretty much where we'd gone, by not upgrading the defense when they should have, and paying attention to special teams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Jontycaster
Half Empty
thequick12
Latest posts
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
5 minutes ago
College Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Calebs Revenge
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 1:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 12:32 PM
All Other Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
'Splain this one Lucy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top