Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So, in the end, who would you rather have?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jess" data-source="post: 255330" data-attributes="member: 1495"><p>I'm not claiming Rodgers is better than Favre. Frankly, at this moment Favre is the better QB. It's because he's on the far superior team though. Give Rodgers the keys to the Vikings offense, and I think he plays just as well as Favre. Give Favre the keys to the Packers and I think he gets sacked 29 times and the team is 4-3. Hell, Favre might've taken more sacks, seeing as how he's less mobile than Rodgers. The question i'm asking is if you'd rather have Favre for 2 years, and then who knows who we'd have, or Rodgers for the next decade.</p><p></p><p>Winning and losing is a team effort. Beating Favre is a team effort. Rodgers poor record is more a reflection on Ted Thompson than it is on Rodgers. Favre outplaying Rodgers is more a reflection on the Vikings supporting cast than it is Rodgers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jess, post: 255330, member: 1495"] I'm not claiming Rodgers is better than Favre. Frankly, at this moment Favre is the better QB. It's because he's on the far superior team though. Give Rodgers the keys to the Vikings offense, and I think he plays just as well as Favre. Give Favre the keys to the Packers and I think he gets sacked 29 times and the team is 4-3. Hell, Favre might've taken more sacks, seeing as how he's less mobile than Rodgers. The question i'm asking is if you'd rather have Favre for 2 years, and then who knows who we'd have, or Rodgers for the next decade. Winning and losing is a team effort. Beating Favre is a team effort. Rodgers poor record is more a reflection on Ted Thompson than it is on Rodgers. Favre outplaying Rodgers is more a reflection on the Vikings supporting cast than it is Rodgers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So, in the end, who would you rather have?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top