Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Similarities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Big Dan" data-source="post: 314618" data-attributes="member: 2728"><p>I can't call it. It's all very close. I tend to I think I'd still take the '96 crew though. </p><p> </p><p>Another way to look at it would be that if you took the 4 receivers from 2010 and put them with Favre in '96, I think production would have been less over all. Jennings would be an absolute monster no doubt, and Driver would catch the slants from Favre, but I still don't think he could have turned them into what Brooks did. The inconsistency of Jones and Nelson coupled with Favre's wildness, especially back then, would have been absolutely disastrous. </p><p> </p><p>Conversely, if you put the 4 guys from '96 with Aaron Rodgers today I think production would go up over all. Imagine if all the drops were catches, or even if 60% of 'em were catches. Our offensive numbers would be just stupid-crazy. </p><p> </p><p>Ideally, I'd take Jennings, Brooks, Driver, and Freeman with Jones as the greatest number 5 that ever lived. But taking the groups as a whole, I'd still have to go with the '96 guys. But like I said earlier, if Jones & Nelson get their consistency up it would most likely go the other way. 1 & 2 are definitely the most important, but we run so many 3 wide, 4 wide, and even 5 wide sets that 3 & 4 aren't too far behind 1 & 2 as far as importance goes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Big Dan, post: 314618, member: 2728"] I can't call it. It's all very close. I tend to I think I'd still take the '96 crew though. Another way to look at it would be that if you took the 4 receivers from 2010 and put them with Favre in '96, I think production would have been less over all. Jennings would be an absolute monster no doubt, and Driver would catch the slants from Favre, but I still don't think he could have turned them into what Brooks did. The inconsistency of Jones and Nelson coupled with Favre's wildness, especially back then, would have been absolutely disastrous. Conversely, if you put the 4 guys from '96 with Aaron Rodgers today I think production would go up over all. Imagine if all the drops were catches, or even if 60% of 'em were catches. Our offensive numbers would be just stupid-crazy. Ideally, I'd take Jennings, Brooks, Driver, and Freeman with Jones as the greatest number 5 that ever lived. But taking the groups as a whole, I'd still have to go with the '96 guys. But like I said earlier, if Jones & Nelson get their consistency up it would most likely go the other way. 1 & 2 are definitely the most important, but we run so many 3 wide, 4 wide, and even 5 wide sets that 3 & 4 aren't too far behind 1 & 2 as far as importance goes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
tynimiller
Jontycaster
Sanguine camper
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 4:34 PM
College Sports
Kraft or Musgrave
Latest: El Guapo
Today at 4:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: sschind
Today at 3:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
What made you a Packers fan?
Latest: rmontro
Today at 3:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Similarities
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top