Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Seattle defense fast approaching
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zombieslayer" data-source="post: 198417" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Mark - It's always a pleasure talking to an opposing fan who actually knows what they're talking about. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Our O in yards is #2 in the NFL, and if I'm not mistaken, #4 in points after NE, Colts, and Cows. It's a high scoring offense that stays on the field for more than half the game consistently. </p><p></p><p>The rushing stats are misleading because we took half the season to figure out that Ryan Grant was head and shoulders above all our other RBs. In that time period, we started Jackson, Morency, and Wynn. All three failed to do much, and our running game was ranked last in the NFL.</p><p></p><p>Since Grant took over, we became #2 in the NFL in rushing yards. Huge difference. But we were so far back that statistically, our running O is not that impressive still.</p><p></p><p>Your D is slightly better than ours. We both allowed 291 points, which is the #1 stat when looking at a D. However, you guys are absolutely sick at getting INTs and Sacks. Those are 2 things that scare me. We're simply going to have to double up on your NFL sack leading DE, because Tauscher is not 100%. MM will do that, because he doesn't want to see Favre take more hits than he has to.</p><p></p><p>You listed a few keys, but my key will be turnovers. If Favre keeps his cool and doesn't turn the ball over, I don't think you'll have a chance. But like you said, your D is sick at getting INTs and Sacks, and some of Favre's INTs have been when he's been hit and his arm was in motion. That is something that greatly worries me about playing your team. As for fumbles, I'm aware your team generates fumbles, but I'm not worried about Grant losing the ball. He's been pretty good about that this year.</p><p></p><p>You mention your STs are your Achilles' Heel. That should probably be a serious concern for you, because we've had something like 5 or 6 TDs on STs (2 fumble recovers for TDs + 3 or 4 returns for TDs). We might be #2 in STs' TD differential in the NFL after da Bears. I'll have to look that stat up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zombieslayer, post: 198417, member: 627"] Mark - It's always a pleasure talking to an opposing fan who actually knows what they're talking about. :) Our O in yards is #2 in the NFL, and if I'm not mistaken, #4 in points after NE, Colts, and Cows. It's a high scoring offense that stays on the field for more than half the game consistently. The rushing stats are misleading because we took half the season to figure out that Ryan Grant was head and shoulders above all our other RBs. In that time period, we started Jackson, Morency, and Wynn. All three failed to do much, and our running game was ranked last in the NFL. Since Grant took over, we became #2 in the NFL in rushing yards. Huge difference. But we were so far back that statistically, our running O is not that impressive still. Your D is slightly better than ours. We both allowed 291 points, which is the #1 stat when looking at a D. However, you guys are absolutely sick at getting INTs and Sacks. Those are 2 things that scare me. We're simply going to have to double up on your NFL sack leading DE, because Tauscher is not 100%. MM will do that, because he doesn't want to see Favre take more hits than he has to. You listed a few keys, but my key will be turnovers. If Favre keeps his cool and doesn't turn the ball over, I don't think you'll have a chance. But like you said, your D is sick at getting INTs and Sacks, and some of Favre's INTs have been when he's been hit and his arm was in motion. That is something that greatly worries me about playing your team. As for fumbles, I'm aware your team generates fumbles, but I'm not worried about Grant losing the ball. He's been pretty good about that this year. You mention your STs are your Achilles' Heel. That should probably be a serious concern for you, because we've had something like 5 or 6 TDs on STs (2 fumble recovers for TDs + 3 or 4 returns for TDs). We might be #2 in STs' TD differential in the NFL after da Bears. I'll have to look that stat up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scheeler
sschind
shockerx
yxz1000r
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
21 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
49 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
58 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Seattle defense fast approaching
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top