Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Report: packers considering tagging Jennings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shawnsta3" data-source="post: 490591" data-attributes="member: 5065"><p>If it comes down to franchising Jennings to keep him here for another year <em>and</em> having to release Finley <strong>or</strong> keeping Finley <em>and</em> having to let Jennings walk I think it should be clear to stick with Finley. Finley is younger, more dynamic and harder to replace than Jennings.</p><p> </p><p>If we franchise Jennings he will still only likely stick around for that one more year. By franchising him we are also overpaying him for his production. If we want to keep Jennings around why not just sign him to a contract? It would come much cheaper then the franchise tag.</p><p> </p><p>I think it would be stupid to release Finley just to keep Jennings around for one more year.</p><p> </p><p>If the point is to tag him and trade him it's a risky bet that I'll bet Thompson's not willing to make. He never has tagged & traded (even with Flynn) and probably never will. As someone said above the pick we trade him for would most likely be around the same as our comp pick anyway. Stupid and won't happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shawnsta3, post: 490591, member: 5065"] If it comes down to franchising Jennings to keep him here for another year [I]and[/I] having to release Finley [B]or[/B] keeping Finley [I]and[/I] having to let Jennings walk I think it should be clear to stick with Finley. Finley is younger, more dynamic and harder to replace than Jennings. If we franchise Jennings he will still only likely stick around for that one more year. By franchising him we are also overpaying him for his production. If we want to keep Jennings around why not just sign him to a contract? It would come much cheaper then the franchise tag. I think it would be stupid to release Finley just to keep Jennings around for one more year. If the point is to tag him and trade him it's a risky bet that I'll bet Thompson's not willing to make. He never has tagged & traded (even with Flynn) and probably never will. As someone said above the pick we trade him for would most likely be around the same as our comp pick anyway. Stupid and won't happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Schultz
Team Ronny
Green_Bay_Packers
lancer84
txj
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
S
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Schultz
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: GreenNGold_81
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
49 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: longtimefan
Today at 9:58 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: Dantés
Today at 9:35 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Report: packers considering tagging Jennings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top