Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Receivers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raptorman" data-source="post: 246580" data-attributes="member: 655"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Ok, so Berrian is not a #1. He missed 1000 yards by 36 yards. At his average that would have been 2 more catches. So if one team doesn’t pass as much as another and spreads the ball around more than they are less likely to have a “true” #1 WR. Berrian averaged over 20 yards a catch, had 7 tds’ on 48 receptions, (1 per 6.8 catches, as opposed to Jennings 1 per 8.9 and Drivers 1 per 14.8 ) and was 36 yards short of 1,000 yards. But in your mind he can’t be a number one with those stats. But it’s ok that he’s not a number one. He doesn’t need to catch 80 passes a year, he needs to catch about 65 at most. I would rather him keep up his yards per catch and td’s per catch then get 80 catches and 1200 yards, as well as his 70.8% first down percentage. Out of the top 15 WR’s last year only 4 had more TD’s then Berrian and 3 had the same number. And for what it’s worth, the last 3 years Berrian has more TD’s than Driver.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Now that Sidney Rice has recovered from his knee injury he should be able to put up some good numbers. He is not real fast but has good hands, good height and will go get the ball. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">And as far as Shiancoe and Lee. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Shiancoe: 42 rec. 596 yards 14.2 yard per catch and 7 Tds.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">Lee: 39 rec. 303 yards 7.8 yards per catch and 5 Tds. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">I think he could start on most teams right now. With a 13 yard per catch average over the last two years I would say he is doing just fine.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">One more thing. The west coast offense is all about slants and screen passes. Not about the deep ball. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raptorman, post: 246580, member: 655"] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]Ok, so Berrian is not a #1. He missed 1000 yards by 36 yards. At his average that would have been 2 more catches. So if one team doesn’t pass as much as another and spreads the ball around more than they are less likely to have a “true” #1 WR. Berrian averaged over 20 yards a catch, had 7 tds’ on 48 receptions, (1 per 6.8 catches, as opposed to Jennings 1 per 8.9 and Drivers 1 per 14.8 ) and was 36 yards short of 1,000 yards. But in your mind he can’t be a number one with those stats. But it’s ok that he’s not a number one. He doesn’t need to catch 80 passes a year, he needs to catch about 65 at most. I would rather him keep up his yards per catch and td’s per catch then get 80 catches and 1200 yards, as well as his 70.8% first down percentage. Out of the top 15 WR’s last year only 4 had more TD’s then Berrian and 3 had the same number. And for what it’s worth, the last 3 years Berrian has more TD’s than Driver.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]Now that Sidney Rice has recovered from his knee injury he should be able to put up some good numbers. He is not real fast but has good hands, good height and will go get the ball. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]And as far as Shiancoe and Lee. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]Shiancoe: 42 rec. 596 yards 14.2 yard per catch and 7 Tds.[/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]Lee: 39 rec. 303 yards 7.8 yards per catch and 5 Tds. [/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]I think he could start on most teams right now. With a 13 yard per catch average over the last two years I would say he is doing just fine.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]One more thing. The west coast offense is all about slants and screen passes. Not about the deep ball. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
41 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:24 AM
College Sports
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 8:12 AM
All Other Sports
H
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:23 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Receivers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top